Posts tagged as:

Teen Interviews

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

The theatre is empty and the sterile fluorescent lights reveal an ordinary scuffed stage; it’s difficult to believe that an entire show had occurred on that very stage only minutes ago, transforming the entire theatre into world of possibilities. The Broken Box Mime Theatre has brought its latest creation, Words Don’t Work, to the Fringe Festival and I was fortunate enough to catch a word or two with the artistic director of Broken Box Mime Theatre after the show.

H5R: So how did this troupe get started, Broken Box Theatre?

RB: I went to Tufts University with a bunch of other people who are now in the troupe and we were part of a mime troupe there called HYPE! Mime Troupe and it was totally student run. When I graduated last year in 2010, I moved to the city to be an actress and knew that this should be part of my life so I organized this company and got in touch with Brian, who’s our producer. He graduated three years before me, Brian Smith, and is now a professional producer in the city. He had also had in mind to continue the work of HYPE! Mime Troupe, so we decided to get going on it. He learned about the Fringe application, I gathered up the people from HYPE! who’d be interested in continuing the work—and everything just snowballed from there.

H5R: So what would say was the easiest part, getting this all together, and the hardest part?

RB: The easiest part of getting it together is finding people who are passionate about this work. It’s so unusual and so bizarre and so fun—and it allows the actor to work on whatever we want. Like, if I’m in the mood to be in a Spanish soap opera, let’s just write it, you know, it’s that kind of thing. So people were really excited to be a part of it and I think that more people after seeing the show—we have a lot of people interested in auditioning. So that was the easiest part. The hardest part is figuring out how to take this step for me, personally, to learn how to make it a business. And we’re still just learning—Brian has been my mentor in that because he’s been in the professional industry much longer than I have. But those are just the small things—who’s gonna take care of this, who’s gonna take care of that, what’s who’s responsibility and how do we go forward in a professional way, and to be able to keep our creative voice alive, keep it a creative company through and through.

H5R: Would you say that that would be the mission statement of your troupe? [click to continue….]

{ 0 comments }

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Edgar Oliver is the closest thing the East Village has to an Urban Legend. His works, which include plays, poetry and fiction, have haunted stages from Downtown to Scotland. When given the opportunity to chat with Edgar about his life and work, he revealed glimpses into the lonely and meditative mind of a wanderer.

The High 5 Review: Mr. Oliver, you’ve spent time in London and Scotland, but you’ve chosen to make the East Village your home, why?

Edgar Oliver: Well, New York is where I got started performing and where I started to read my poems. I never had the inkling to perform but always to write. It never occurred to me to perform, but I knew I would read. I began reading at the Pyramid, a night club, at two in the morning after the people had been listening to dance music for hours. I had to perform in a setting like that and I loved it because it connected to the people.

H5R: Since you’ve been performing in the city for so long, how have you observed the theater industry change? [click to continue….]

{ 0 comments }

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

The International Center of Photography‘s Hiroshima: Ground Zero, 1945 is a harrowing collection of photographs from the United States Strategic Bombing Survey after the atomic bomb was dropped on the city on
August 6, 1945.

TRaC-er Dalia Wolfson takes us behind the scene of the exhibition in an exclusive interview with curator Erin Barnett. Check out the video!

Want more? Don’t miss your chance to see the exhibition before it closes on Sunday, August 28th! Get your 2-for-$5 museum passes to ICP from High align=”center”

{ 0 comments }

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

22 Stories, a FringeNYC show currently playing at IATI Theater, showcases both a distinct age and an exceptional playwright. Seventeen-year-old Sofia Johnson, a senior at Bard Early College High School, has written a play that captures the angst, torment and conflict of teenage years, from an insider’s perspective. 22 Stories follows Nicole, a motivated, academic student as she struggles to come to terms with the suicidal drop of her twin sister, Natasha. I sat down with the purple-haired prodigy Sofia to discuss the play’s trajectory, from a script on paper to a show at the Fringe.

The High 5 Review: As a twin, I can definitely relate to the idea that you present in 22 Stories of two siblings with divergent personalities. Did you imagine Natasha and Nicole first as extremes and then as characters?

Sofia Johnson: Yes, I did imagine them as extremes. The idea of twins having these polar opposite personalities and having to confront these differences constantly – because simply, technically they’re so close all the time – creates something that is very interesting to see on the stage. It was only after writing some scenes between the twins, along with some internal monologues, that I was able to understand who these people were and where they were coming from. So the characters eventually began to speak for themselves, and it was amazing.

H5R: I can imagine that seeing those paper characters come alive must have been thrilling. That process – casting, revising, and rehearsing – is often a very intensive one. Was there a main challenge that you had to overcome?

SJ: I did have writer’s possessiveness; with the ending, it took a long time to figure out. There were a lot of scenes where the director, Anna Wilson, would have one idea, and if the thought of the idea was really not working with the words of the play, I would have to restrain myself from saying, “No, that’s not how it is!” We needed to figure out the ways that she and I were in control, and trying to make them coexist. But it was great to have someone that I trusted so well and had known for so long, because this is my first show: if anyone’s going to mess it up it might as well be her, because at the end of the day we would still see eye-to-eye on many of the things.

Overall, though, I do try to be open-minded, but there are still some things that tick me off – like when the cause & effect gets thrown off… that’s when my Mama Bear instincts kick in. Is it a challenge? Yes. Did things go back to the way I had originally wanted them to? Also, yes.

H5R: So you got your way, in the end?

SJ: Yeah, it was kind of a U-Turn of things first not going quite the way I want. Then I object to it, and then I finally get used to it and suddenly, “Oh, just kidding, we’re changing it back again.” But obviously right now, I’m very happy with the way it is.

H5R: Okay, so now one of those dream-situation questions: if you had a few more minutes beyond the Fringe limit, or a few more months beyond the deadline, what would you do?

SJ: If I had a few more minutes or months to write, I might have expanded on the home life of Nicole and Natasha. It’s such an interesting home life, where the parents sympathize more with the rebellious teenager than the studious one; it would be interesting to see that interaction and would shed some light on how Nicole and Natasha developed into those two types of teenagers. I would also expand the friends scene, because I love her friends and they’re so much fun to write. In terms of the ending…I don’t want to think about it anymore, I am done with it.

H5R: How was opening night? Were there any surprises, pleasant and otherwise?

SJ: The house was less than half-full, but the pleasant surprise came from our fabulous venue director, who told me that our show had sold more seats than any other show that day, which was the opening day of all of Fringe in general. And of course, it’s been a pretty rewarding experience to hear people’s feedback, because the show’s been within this small circle of people who have been acquainted with it, in and out, for six weeks, and to have other people look at it was refreshing. It’s nice to be able to take your head out from underwater every once in a while.

H5R: I just wanted to take the time to mention an especially memorable reaction – remember that lady who spoke during the talk-back with the French accent?

SJ: That was one. That was unlike anything that I’ve ever experienced.

H5R: Possibly the best quote of the night: “Twin-ness is a magnifying glass onto the universal need for unity.”

SJ: She said that!?

H5R: And it wasn’t scripted.

SJ: I think that’s the prime anecdote there. Although my friend did text me – her parents own a little coffee shop nearby- and she said that one of their regulars had come in, seen one of my play postcards, and said that she’d seen the play and loved it – which is nice, though not nearly as anecdotal as that. That really takes the cake.

H5R: People tend to write off plays about youth as “Young Adult” genre-literature. Do you think your play falls into that category? How is 22 Stories different? Does it aim to be mature, as opposed to targeting an age group?

SJ: A lot of the problems in there are especially issues that high school students struggle with. Those are everyone’s struggles, so everyone can relate…but teenagers find these challenges particularly relevant. I think one of the main aspects that distinguishes 22 Stories is that with a similar play and plot, it would be an adult dictating what they think a high schooler’s life is like. In the case of my play, this is what I feel like, as someone who is experiencing this and is explaining my own emotions, and you’ll just have to take my word for it. This is what a teenager is feeling. In that sense, yes, it can be themed ‘young adult’, though I don’t like to classify things as young adult or adult, because that can restrict audiences.

H5R: How have you been enjoying the Fringe experience?

SJ: I love it. It’s beyond amazing. Everything about this has been so completely surreal, and the fact that we went to a Town Hall meeting and I got to hear what everyone’s show was about….knowing my play fit in with all of these shows and then having auditions, realizing that here are people who want to be in a show I’ve written- that was crazy, too. Being in tech and being in the house, thinking that I was going to have my work here and seeing it on stage all the time – it’s wonderful, absolutely wonderful.

H5R: And finally: with your show on stage and going strong, what have you learned? What’s the “Take-away”?

SJ: I’ve realized that I want to do it again, that I want to have more plays put on with more actors…that I want to write. I’ve caught the playwright bug.

The final  performances of 22 Stories will be on:

Fri, Aug 26, 2011, 7 pm

Sun, Aug 28, 2011, 3:15 pm
*Learn more and buy tickets here!

And look out for Sofia’s work in the future – she’s currently revising a new play about a small-town teenager who impregnates his girlfriend, then runs away to hitchhike with a band of travelling anarchists.

{ 1 comment }

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

We walk into the quiet teashop together and Emily Jablonski promptly orders a cup of coffee. She had been overseeing a last minute rehearsal only hours before and confided that she needed a little boost. Jablonski is the director of the mash-up musical Gleeam, which combines the hit show Glee and the horror film classic Scream that has made it up from Washington D.C. to New York under the guidance of the Landless Theatre Co. A few hours before the NY premiere at the Fringe Festival, I got a chance to talk with her a little about the musical and herself.

The High 5 Review:  So, why Glee, why Scream, what is this musical really about?

EJ: Okay, so Glee and Scream, Gleeam I should say, was part of—well the people who made it was the Landless Theatre Company and back in January we did a thing called the Mash-Up Festival and it took four or eight different things and combined them into mash-ups. So we had All That Jaws, which combined Chicago and Jaws; PeeWee’s Big Side of Adventure, Tarzanadoo and then Gleeam. Basically it takes the characters we know and love in Glee. It’s more of a parody, so it kind of stereotypes those characters and has them slowly being killed off by a—

H5R: A masked slasher.

EJ: Yeah, yeah and there’s like a plot twist at the end. So it’s really funny, a little risqué. Glee in general, the show is more adult-themed anyway. It’s kind of about high school but it’s geared more towards the young adults or older adults. That’s essentially what it’s about. It’s kind of a parody, a mash-up; it takes the best of both of those things and makes them into something fun and entertaining theatre.

H5R: Did you pick this specifically or were you assigned this?

EJ: No, I was asked—well how I got involved with Landless, I mean most of theatre is networking really. I was in an apprentice at this stage which was an original theatre in Maryland, in the DC Metro area and then after that I was in an assistant director apprenticeship there so I started sending my résumé out to all the directors in the area to ask for assistant directing opportunities and that lead me to meet somebody else who got me to meet Christopher Finn, which is how I got to meet Landless and it was kind of just a networking thing and then they offered for me to direct this show and when a young director kind of trying to get in the theatre scene in you know, a city, that’s really the way to do it.

H5R: Was this kind of your big break?

EJ: I wouldn’t call it a big break. I think being able to direct a show in New York is a big deal. So we’ll see what comes of it. It’s constant networking, constant meeting people and that sort of thing. I did express interest in directing this in particular because I love Glee and it’s just a treat to do this, primarily because I like the script, the script is really funny, it allows for some really fun choices in staging things, stuff like that.

H5R: So is the musical based on a specific season of the show?

EJ: When we did it in DC, it was really based on season one, but there’s also been some rewrites that kind of incorporate some other things from season two. So it’s just kind of like an overall—like if anyone has seen it or is a Gleek, follows Glee, they’ll probably get the references.

H5R: Did you enjoy directing it?

EJ: Absolutely, absolutely. I’ve been blessed with a really great cast; it’s been a lot of fun. I mean today was exhausting [the director had a last-minute rehearsal before the interview] but we were laughing the whole time, and it’s really great to be able to direct something that you really enjoy or have fun doing cause otherwise, why do theatre? I mean that’s why—it’s a really collaborative process and I really enjoyed directing new work. I’ve been able to direct the DC premiere and to do that again here, it’s really—there’s a sense of accomplishment.

H5R: So how did you get from DC to New York? How did you get into the Fringe Festival?

EJ: I actually never was in contact with the Fringe Festival. Essential what happened was that Andy, who is the producing artistic director at Landless and also wrote Gleeam, he had asked me to direct Gleeam back in DC and then when it got accepted into NY Fringe, he really liked what I did with the show in DC so he asked me to come up to direct it for NY Fringe and I said absolutely. So that’s how I really got involved; more with the company as opposed to actually emailing with the Fringe. I didn’t even know they were going to bring it to NY Fringe until they told me, so, it’s pretty cool.

H5R: As you were directing it, did you find that you changed things from the script or…?

EJ: I try not to deviate from the script too much; I’ve worked as an actor, I’ve worked as a stage manager. I really believe in the hierarchy of theatre. I think that one of the things that drew me to theatre in general is the collaborative process and I think that to be really successful you have to accept everyone’s rules. I like to really take what’s on the paper and bring it to the stage. One of the benefits of working on new work, on new scripts where the playwright is really involved, it’s if the things aren’t working in rehearsal, you can kind of talk to them and say, “Hey, this isn’t really meshing.” And usually, playwrights are usually open with that, because they want their work to be the best it can be as well. So, I don’t really change the script at all.

H5R: No improv, or anything like that?

EJ: No, there’s not really improv in this show. I mean, in terms, of entrances and exits, I think that that’s really a director’s choice and a playwright kind of gives you a guide of how things should happen, but you can deviate from that. In terms of the language, I make sure the actors stay pretty verbatim, because I think that playwrights look for certain words; there are specific things why they wrote things a certain way and you have to respect their art, just like you would respect anyone else’s in the process.

H5R: Are you interested in being a playwright?

EJ: Not me in particular, no. I like writing and there have been some things that have happened in life that I have considered, oh this would make a really good play, but I’m more or less just leave it to more talented writers. I’m really—I enjoy directing, out of all the things that I’ve done.

H5R: So did directing come after acting, after stage-managing?

EJ: Yeah, I started acting when I was in high school. It was actually my freshman year in high school, I was walking into a bus, I saw a sign for auditions and I—I always wanted to do it, so I just walked in. It was called Anne of The Thousand Days and I walked into auditions and I got cast and my life kind of changed after that, I realized it was what I really wanted to do. So I studied theatre in college, I just kind of had my hand in everything, just to get a well-rounded education. Once, I took a directing class junior year and I remember I was up till about three in the morning working on a project for my directing class and I didn’t realize it was three in the morning, I was having so much fun. And I was always brought up to follow what you want to do in life, not what’s gonna give you the most money, so I realized if I’ve been doing this for six hours and it doesn’t feel like six hours then that’s what I should be doing. So after that I really started pursuing directing. After college I actually moved to New York for a while and I got some assistant directing opportunities and stage managing.

H5R: To go back to the musical—does the audience have to know both Glee and Scream to really understand the show?

EJ: No, I mean you can enjoy it. I think that people who know the characters of Glee will understand the humor a little more, but I think anyone would come out and enjoy this, as long as they’re open-minded.

H5R: So it’s an all-ages sort of thing?

EJ: It’s actually recommended for 18 plus, basically because of minor nudity, the language and things like that so I wouldn’t say anyone. Like my grandmother wants to go and see it, like it’s not really her thing, but she’s going to come see it anyway. But, I think that theatre is really subjective and it’s hard to say that anyone would love this play because you really don’t know and I think that’s what’s really cool about theatre or art in general is one man’s trash is another man’s treasure so to speak. I mean I’ve gone to shows where people have absolutely loved something that I have hated. I mean—I would recommend this show to anyone who’s open-minded and wants to have a good time and if you’re a Glee fan.

{ 0 comments }

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Poe-Dunk: A Matchbox Entertainment is theatrical alchemy—a golden marathon of Edgar Allan Poe’s lesser-known works, humbly sprouted from two sides of the humor spectrum. Actor-turned-director Kevin P. Hale returns to the stage as a slightly exaggerated version of himself, crackling with both the energy of an impassioned Poe aficionado and the leveled, snarky wit of a professor. He seamlessly streams through thirty-five Poe pieces in one hour, making full use of creative license to condense each tale into an offbeat skit laden with guilty-pleasure puns.

Though presented on a standard-sized stage, much of Poe-Dunk’s action occurs on a miniature scale. A series of painstakingly intricate matchbox stages—among many, a fully furnished living room for “The Philosophy of Furniture”— serves as the setting for spirited interaction between matchstick puppets. (A camcorder films the palm-sized theatres live; the video is projected in real-time for easy viewing.) Whether it be Poe’s grim “Annabel Lee” or sinister murder tale “The Cask of Amontillado”, Hale breathes a lively fire into his matchstick characters, crafting subtle tongue-in-cheek humor with good-natured slapstick. “Desultory Notes on Cats,” Poe’s brief reflection on the origin and appeal of cats, in particular sees the charm of his liberally comedic hand. Though initially in keeping with Poe’s written Adam and Eve explanation of cat behavior, Hale abruptly changes course, culminating the piece with a sly pun about Cats on Broadway.

The performance’s true zest, however, lies in Hale’s one-man monologues. Laced with an irresistibly earnest appeal, the solo digressions offer a quaint reprieve from the whimsical action of his matchbox plays. Most ingenious is a seconds-long rendition of “The Man that is Used Up”. Hale—speaking as the “used up man” in question— delivers the modestly poignant one-liner: “This show exhausts me.”

I was recently able to delve into the method of Poe-Dunk’s mastermind and Artistic Director of Playlab NYC, Kevin P. Hale. Here’s what I found:

The High 5 Review: What inspired your specific focus on Edgar Allen Poe versus other authors of the same time period? What attracted you to Poe’s style?

Kevin P. Hale: I love reading horror, and in the United States, horror stories all end at Poe. Poe’s a mopey guy, I’m mopey guy…his stories temperamentally appeal to me.

H5: How do you handle making all of your matchbox stick characters and props? Is there any special equipment necessary to work with such small-scale pieces?

KPH: I use a photocopier to shrink all drawings down to size and make sure my puppets are to scale. I have spent a lot of time at a Kinko’s shrinking down my sketches and patterns to make my matchboxes, I also use a variety of X-Acto knives, changing the blades frequently to make sure that I’m getting clean cuts in the cardstock and poster board.  I also use a bookmaking tool called a bone scorer, which is a sort of dull knife made of cow’s bone that allows me to make sharp folds. Besides those tools, there is a lot of Elmer’s glue and acrylic paint. A lot of Internet research has to be done for constructing the matchbox sets—researching images of the Park Theatre, for example.

H5: You maintain a wonderful balance between endearing comedy for children and more mature, tongue-in-cheek wit for adults in the audience. What approach do you take when writing the script for Poe-Dunk? Do the puns and jokes flow as you write?

KPH: I love bad, corny jokes, so they tend to come out when I write. The repetition of rehearsing helps me see where the laughs are and develop more jokes. “The Fall of the House of Usher” was initially meant to be a longer piece, but it didn’t get many laughs. So I shortened it and changed up the humor.

H5: You’re following the humor, in a sense.

KPH: Exactly. If there’s no sense of playfulness and whimsy, I’m not terribly interested in developing the story. Perhaps it’s just my short attention span.

H5: How do you manage the pressure of running a one-man show? Does manipulating the matchbox theatre and puppets take off the nervous edge?

KPH: It takes the edge off a lot. I haven’t been on stage in sixteen years, and I’ve thought of myself as more of a show-off than an actor. It can get uncomfortable being myself in front of an audience, trying to be funny. The matchbox theatre lets the audience disappear, and the focus is on the interaction between the matchsticks. Laughs from the audience sometimes make me forget my next line. I just think, “Oh! I got a laugh!” But when I’m focused on the matchsticks, it’s easier to remember what I’ve written. I get inspiration from seeing my son play with his trains and cars…he becomes so focused and absorbed in moving the toys.

{ 1 comment }